The University Grants Commission's decision to hire assistant professors has sparked concerns among

The decision on the recruitment of Assistant Professors by the University Grants Commission (UGC). Raises Concerns – It has come to my attention that the University Grants Commission (UGC) has issued a notice on July 5th elucidating the requisite requirements for those aspiring to hold assistant professor jobs. There are divergent perspectives about this decision. The following article presents the viewpoints of present faculty members and those who have a doctoral degree.

The minimum criteria for the appointment of an assistant professor.

The need for those aspiring to apply for the job of associate professor must have achieved a passing score on the National Eligibility Test (NET), the Set, or the SLET has been determined by the University Grants Commission (UGC). Nevertheless, the choice did not get majority approval, and it is important to acknowledge that each individual was entitled to their own perspective.

The plan faced resistance from Ph.D. students and faculty members who were already working at the university. They highlighted their concerns on the potential negative impact on the overall quality of assistant professors. It was also observed that individuals who have a Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) degree undergo a rigorous educational journey lasting around four to five years when they are enrolled in the Ph.D. programme. Furthermore, the applicants get support in their preparation for the doctoral research that they will undertake as a consequence of this process. Conversely, there exists a substantial contingent that maintains the belief that people will continue to exhibit a preference for candidates with a Doctor of Philosophy degree, since these individuals possess a considerable wealth of expertise and erudition, and are also seen as impartial.

What is the perspective of academicians on this matter?

Furthermore, those who have previously been affiliated with the UGC assert that this determination exacerbates the applicant's confusion rather than providing them with elucidation. Historically, having a strong academic foundation has been a prerequisite for someone to be deemed eligible for the position of associate professor. As a consequence, possessing a PhD degree was seen as very beneficial for an individual.

In conclusion, it can be inferred that the aforementioned points collectively support the notion that one plausible inference is that a significant proportion of the candidates express satisfaction with the result of the voting process. Conversely, scholars and educators with PhD qualifications have varying perspectives, contending that such divergence may contribute to a deterioration in the overall excellence of the educational process.